Cours gratuits > Forum > Forum anglais: Questions sur l'anglais || En bas
Message de weiy posté le 29-05-2011 à 19:10:29
Bonsoir,
Pourriez-vous corriger mon texte s'il vous plaît ?
Merci d'avance pour vos réponses.
Create to replace the human beings in several tasks of the everyday life as do the housework to be, wash the ground, to wash the dishes, either still to take care of old persons, of babies, either of handicapped persons.
Robots stop multiplying these last years however it has positive points and negative against these robots of modern times there!
The advantages of robots are evident: they work faster and more exactly than a man. They never need a break or holidays. By using them 24 hours a day, we gain(win) the maximum of capacity. Stronger than the men(people), they do not need to sleep and are not never sick.A robot can replace tens of persons.The robot allowed to replace the man in certain works considered as difficult and dangerousIt is an advantage in the field of the medicine. Indeed The sector of the health begins to be concerned by the technological evolution, with manipulator robots used in microsurgery to assist the patrician (for example to place equipments(castings off) in a very precise way in surgery of the brain)
There are robots in domains as the cleaning (robot vacuum cleaner, robot lawn mower), or in the management of the house, it is an advantage for the human, because, they are in charge of(are loaded with) with their work and do not have time to make all its tasks.
The inconvenience of robots it is because they are source(spring) of unemployment for the human(people), it is thus a very big problem for the human beings
They are no feelings nor even of reaction, one do not can everything confide(entrust) to them (Ex: If a baby cries he protests which thing(matter), the robot has no reaction, it knows not the word " to cry he ".) it but thus in danger the life of the child.
Machines without "natural" intelligence are
We cannot put robots to whatever work … Let us imagine an old person, who needs attention. We see sending him(her) a robot to take care of her? The robot cannot express of feelings, and even if that this is endowed with word, and indeed, it will not be the same listening as a human being.
Conclusion: I find that well when it is about things(tricks) kind lawn mowers, or vacuum cleaner who can help us in our everyday life. But when they replace us in our jobs(businesses), I find that completely stupid! Because the unemployment is already raised(already brought up), then if robots replace us, we shall not be of no use any more and more nobody will win a salary (to part making them of robots)
-------------------
Modifié par lucile83 le 29-05-2011 19:11
-------------------
Modifié par lucile83 le 29-05-2011 22:12
Bonjour,
Votre texte provient de toute évidence d'un traducteur en ligne, ce que nous ne corrigeons pas.
Vous pouvez consulter un dictionnaire (pas un traducteur) en faisant un double clic sur un mot.
Merci de nous proposer un travail personnel qui sera alors sans doute vérifié.
Best wishes.
Réponse: Correction/Robots de weiy, postée le 29-05-2011 à 21:25:23
????
Réponse: Correction/Robots de gerondif, postée le 29-05-2011 à 21:40:07
Bonsoir,
proposez votre travail, pas celui du robot qui traduit vos erreurs:
il mais ainsi la vie du bébé en danger:
it but thus in danger the life of the child.
ou encore :
On ne peut pas tout leur confier:
one do not can everything confide(entrust) to them
Les doubles choix que vous nous proposez sont typiques des traducteurs.(source/spring)...