Rack Your Brains and Help!/ 40

Rack Your Brains and Help!/ 40
Message de here4u posté le 10-02-2019 à 17:27:03 (S | E | F)
Hello, Dear Friends,

Cette fois, je n’ose plus dire que le devoir est facile … (ou moins difficile que certaines fois … ) Je veux cependant vous répéter que vous êtes libres de vous arrêter QUAND VOUS LE VOULEZ, ou de ne faire qu’une partie si vous préférez … Ne vous excusez surtout pas de le faire … Ce test est long et la simple compréhension du texte peut déjà demander beaucoup de temps … Ne donnez que ce que vous pouvez consacrer, mais que ce soit YOUR BEST ! J’en serai ravie …
Cet exercice est un et sa correction sera online le lundi 25 février, tard.
Comme toujours, I’m sure THE FORCE will be WITH YOU !


I)Please, help my student! He really needs you! ATTENTION ! Ce texte contient 2O fautes à corriger ! Cependant, cette fois encore, vous en verrez beaucoup plus, car mon élève est très « consistent » une fois fait une faute, il la répète tout le long du texte, car il la fait de bonne foi ! … Merci de corriger ces fautes, en ne les comptant que pour « une seule », à chaque fois …
( ! Lors de votre correction, merci aussi de REMPLACER LES FAUTES ET DE METTRE VOS CORRECTIONS EN MAJUSCULES; )
There’s a double standard concerning a woman having armpit hairs and a man having armpit hairs… Should you have or wax? There’s most pression for men these days to do that. As a man, have a hairless body is about beauty and not masculinity. In the case of women, have a hairless body means be beautiful and feminine. So, you can’t be feminine and have body hairs…
Can the choice between body hairs or not be sexist?
A model who had chosen not to have or wax got rape threads. A rape can be seen as a way to express control. Therefore, here body hairs were considered as something out of control and which needed to be controlled. She had stopped waxing because she had realised that society made her feeling pression to wax, because she was a woman, not because she wanted. She heard «No guys will want you if you don’t have...» or «It’s unhygienic!» Men now! For having his shirt open and showing chesthairs, an actor was asked: «Are you man enough for the hairy- chested revival?» The male body is definitely more visible now: it’s more public, it’s more scrutinized, seen as a problem. Men’s magazines tell their readers that they need to get rid of body hairs and more products are offering to do so;
What role has History plaid in our body hairs attitudes? Archaeologists reckon that cavemen and women were the first to start having, using little stones as havers and tiny little shells as tweezers. That was for more safety so that their ennemies had nothing to hold on to. Also, it was to stop frostbite and louse. The Egyptians considered body hairs be uncivilized. Women would remove hairs from eyebrowns down. The Romans made hair removed more about class and used massive tweezer liking things called «volsella». Later, Charles Darwin taught the public that humans are descended from an ape like ancestor. We lost our fur due to sexual selection. We preferred hairless mates. So hairlessness became common, and in turning beautiful. Through the years, that idea has evolved and with clothes getting shorter, it became more of a focus. Males now have an ideal body image which has shifted from hairy to smooth and hairless.
We need a more neutral and natural attitude and see it as a personnal decision and not necessary as a public and politic statement. If there’s more choice, more freedom and fewer body shaming, things could be different in the future.

II) Find the «scrambled » words or reorder them in these three sentences:

1.. DURNOA the DRWLO, ENM are GIASNVH, GIUCINDLN HTECS, KABC, SEGL and SOBWR. 9
2. WORRY/ INCREASINGLY/ MEN/ HAIR/ WOMEN/ BODY/ AS/ IS/ A/ AND/ BOTH/ SEEN/ FOR/ 13
3. EVERY/ GIRLS/ MAN / OFF/ BE/ BE/ YOURSELF/ HAIR/ FOR/ FOR/ TO/ SHAVED/ CLEAN/ NICE/ YOUR/ NEEDS/ 16

III) OPTIONAL: Please, reorder the words or unscramble them in these sentences so as to make meaningful sentences:
a) A/ LOTS/ HAIR/ HAIR/ GUY/ CHEST/ CHEST/ GUY/ MANLIER/ PROBABLY/ LITTLE/ WITH/ WITH/ THAN/ OF/ IS/ A/ A/ NO/ 19
b) In the TALS EPOLUC of SAYRE NYLTPE of SLTAECIR have LDAELC for women to stop IOGENVMR and start GIOGNWR. 8

Comme toujours, you have THE FORCE!

---

Réponse : Rack Your Brains and Help!/ 40 de vaiana, postée le 11-02-2019 à 17:15:16 (S | E)
Hello.
it has been ages since I have not realized one of your exercises! I am on vacation, I have a lot of free time, so... WHY NOT???
LET'S HAVE FUN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I) There’s a double standard concerning a woman SHAVING HAIRY ARMPITS and a man having HAIRY ARMPITS… Should you SHAVE or wax? There’s most pression for men these days to do that. As a man, HAVING a hairless body is about beauty and not masculinity. In the case of women, HAVING a hairless body means BEING beautiful and feminine. So, you can’t be feminine and have body HAIR…
Can the choice between body HAIR or not be sexist?
A model who had chosen not to SHAVE or wax got rape threads. A rape can be seen as a way to express control. Therefore, HER body HAIR were considered as something out of control and which needed to be controlled. She had stopped waxing because she had realised that THE society made her feeling pression to wax, because she was a woman, not because she wanted TO. She heard «No GUY will want you if you don’t SHAVE...» or «It’s unhygienic!» Men now! For having his shirt OPENED and showing CHESTHAIR, an actor was asked: «Are you A man enough for the hairy- chested revival?» The male body is definitely more visible now: it’s more public, it’s more scrutinized, seen as a problem. Men’s magazines tell TO their readers that they need to get rid of body HAIR and more products are OFFERED to do so;
What role has History PLAYED in our body HAIR attitudes? Archaeologists reckon that cavemen and women were the first to start SHAVING, using little stones as SHAVERS and tiny little shells as tweezers. That was for more safety so that their ENEMIES had nothing to hold on to. Also, it was to stop FROSTBITES and LICE. Egyptians considered HAVING body HAIR AS TO be uncivilized. Women would remove HAIR from EYEBROWS down. Romans made hair removed more about CLASSES and used massive TWEEZERS LIKE things called «volsella». Later, Charles Darwin taught the public that humans HAD descended from an ape AS AN ancestor. We lost our fur due to sexual selection. We preferred hairless mates. So hairlessness became common, and IT TURNED beautiful. Through the years, that idea has evolved and with clothes getting shorter, it became more of a focus. Males now have an ideal body image which has shifted from hairy to smooth and hairless.
We need a more neutral and natural attitude and see it as a PERSONAL decision and not necessary as a public and politic statement. If there WERE more choice, more freedom and fewer body shaming, things WOULD BE ABLE TO be different in the future.

II)
1. AROUND the WORLD, MEN are SHAVING, INCLUDING CHEST, BACK, LEGS and BROWS.
2. Body hair is increasingly seen as a worry for both women and men.
3. I don't know

READY TO BE CORRECTED.

---

Réponse : Rack Your Brains and Help!/ 40 de magie8, postée le 15-02-2019 à 20:13:05 (S | E)
hello J' AIME découvrir ces textes qui sont toujours des cas de société interessants ready to correct

I)Please, help my student! He really needs you! ATTENTION ! Ce texte contient 2O fautes à corriger ! Cependant, cette fois encore, vous en verrez beaucoup plus, car mon élève est très « consistent » une fois fait une faute, il la répète tout le long du texte, car il la fait de bonne foi ! … Merci de corriger ces fautes, en ne les comptant que pour « une seule », à chaque fois …
( ! Lors de votre correction, merci aussi de REMPLACER LES FAUTES ET DE METTRE VOS CORRECTIONS EN MAJUSCULES; )

There’s a double standard concerning a woman having armpit HAIR and a man having armpit HAIR… Should you SHAVE or wax? There’s MORE pression for men these days to do that. As a man, have a hairless body is about beauty and not masculinity. In the case of women, have a hairless body means be beautiful and feminine. So, you can’t be feminine and have body HAIR…
Can WE HAVE the choice between a HAIRY BODY or not be sexist?
A model who had chosen not to SHAVE or wax got rape THREATS. A rape can be seen as a way to express control. Therefore, here body HAIR were considered as something out of control and which needed to be controlled. She had stopped waxing because she had realised that society made her feeling pression to wax, because she was a woman, not because she wanted TO. She heard «No GUY will want you if you don't SHAVE...» or «It’s unhygienic!» Men now! For having THEIR shirtS open and showing chest HAIR, an actor was asked: «Are you man enough for the hairy-CHEST revival?» The male body is definitely more visible now: it's more public, it's more scrutiniSed,( le z c'est US) seen as a problem. Men’s magazines tell their readers that they need to get rid of body HAIR and more products are offering to do so;
What role has History PLAYED in our body HAIR attitudes? Archaeologists reckon that cavemen and women were the first to start SHAVING, using little stones LIKE havers and tiny little shells LIKE tweezers. That was for more safety so that their ENEMIES had nothing to hold on to. Also, it was to stop FROSTBITES and LICE. The Egyptians considered body HAIR be UNCIVILISED. Women would remove HAIR from eyebrowns down. The Romans made hair removed more about OF class and used massive tweezerS LIKE things called «volsella». Later, Charles Darwin taught the public that humans are descended from THE ape AS ancestor. We lost our fur due to sexual selection. We preferred hairless mates. So hairlessness HAS BECOME common,(pas and)in turning beautiful. Through the years, that idea has evolved and with clothes getting shorter, it became more of a focus. Males now have an ideal body image which has shifted from hairy to smooth and hairless.
We need a more neutral and natural attitude and see it as a PERSONAL decision and not necessary as a public and politic statement. If there’s more choice, more freedom and fewer body shaming, things could be different in the future.

ANECDOTE
Lors d'une conférence je viens d apprendre que
EN 1704 PIERRE LE GRAND INSTAURA PAR DECRET UN IMPOT SUR LA BARBE.En revenant de France en 1699, par un oukase il avait interdit le port de la barbe car il voulait occidentaliser et moderniser la Russie., mais l'église refusa parce que Jesus avait une barbe et c'était un symbole religieux, aussi il a exempté l'Eglise de l'impôt.


II) find the "scrambled" words or reorder them in these 3 sentencesbon à corriger

1)AROUND the WORLD, MEN are SHAVING, INCLUDING CHESTS, BACK, LEGS and BROWS.
A travers le monde,les hommes se rasent;y compris la poitrine,le dos,les jambes et les sourcils

2)For both men and women body hair is increasingly seen as a worry.
Pour les hommes et les femmes le corps velu est vu de plus en plus comme un souci.

3) For girls, your hair needs be nice for yourself, every man shaved off to be clean.
Pour les filles, vos cheveux ont besoin d'être beaux pour vous même, chaque homme se rase pour être propre.


OPTIONAL

a) Lots of a guy with chest hair is probably a little manlier than a guy with no chest hair
le sort, d'un garçon avec du poil sur la poitrine est probablement un peu plus viril que pour celui qui n'en a pas.

je ne comprend pas trop pourquoi lots est au pluriel ?

b)In the LAST COUPLE of YEARS PLENTY of RECITALS have CALLED for women to stop REMOVING and start GROWING.
Au cours des deux dernières années beaucoup de considérants ont appelés les femmes à cesser de s'épiler et commencer à grandir
-------------------
Modifié par magie8 le 16-02-2019 18:00

---

Réponse : Rack Your Brains and Help!/ 40 de tereda, postée le 19-02-2019 à 14:31:15 (S | E)
hello everyone,

I've tried to help HERE4U's student !

this is my try, ready to be corrected.

There’s a double-standard concerning a woman having armpit hairs and a man having armpit hairs… Should THEY have TO wax or Not ?
There’s MORE PRESSURE for men these days to do that. As a man, HAVING a hairless body is about beauty and not masculinity. In the case of women, HAVING a hairless body means be beautiful and feminine. So, you can’t be feminine and have body hairs…Can the choice between body hairs or not be sexist?
A model who had chosen not to have or wax got rape THREATS. A rape can be seen as a way to express control. Therefore, HER body hairs were considered as something out of control and which needed to be controlled.
She had stopped waxing because she had realised that society made her feeling PRESSURE to wax, because she was a woman, not because she wanted. She heard «No guys will want you if you don’t have...» or «It’s not HYGIENIC!»

Men now! For having his shirt open and showing CHEST HAIRS, an actor was asked: «Are you man enough for the hairy-chested revival?» The male body is definitely more visible now: it’s more public, it’s more scrutinized, seen as a problem. MEN MAGAZINES tell their readers that they need to get rid of body hairs and more products are offering to do so.

What role has History PLAYED in our body hairs attitudes?

Archaeologists reckon that cavemen and women were the first to start SHAVING, using little stones as SHAVERS and tiny little shells as tweezers. That was for more safety so that their ENEMIES had nothing to hold on to. Also, it was to stop frostbite and louse. The Egyptians considered body hairs be uncivilized. Women would remove hairs from eyebrows down. The Romans made hair removed more about class and used massive TWEEZERS liking things called «volsella». Later, Charles Darwin taught the public that humans are descended from an ape like ancestor. We lost our fur due to sexual selection. We preferred hairless mates. So hairlessness became common, and in turning beautiful. Through the years, that idea has evolved and with clothes getting shorter, it became more of a focus. Males now have an ideal body image which has shifted from hairy to smooth and hairless.

We need a more neutral and natural attitude and see it as a PERSONAL decision and not necessary as a public and politic statement. If there’s more choice, more freedom and fewer body shaming, things could be different in the future.

Thanks to you, HERE4U for your correction.

---

Réponse : Rack Your Brains and Help!/ 40 de icare29, postée le 20-02-2019 à 17:52:49 (S | E)
Hello Here4u , and all hard workers , here is my work OK FOR CORRECTION.


There's a double standard concerning a woman having armpit HAIR and a man having armpit HAIR ? Should you SHAVE or wax? There's MORE PRESSURE for men these days to do that. As a man, have a hairless body is about beauty and not masculinity. In the case of women, have a hairless body means TO be beautiful and FEMINITY. So, you can't be feminine and have body HAIR ?
Can WE HAVE the choice between body HAIR AND not TO be sexist?

A model, who had chosen NEITHER to SHAVE NOR TO wax ,got rape THREATS. A rape COULD be seen as a way to express control. Therefore, here body HAIR were considered as something out of control , which needed to be controlled. She had stopped waxing because she had realised that society made her feeling UNDER PRESSURE to wax, because she was a woman, not because she wanted TO BE ..

She heard «No GUY will want you if you don't have...» or «It's unhygienic!» Men now! For having his shirt open and showing HIS CHEST HAIR , an actor was asked: «Are you ENOUGH MAN for the hairy-CHEST revival?» The male body is definitely more visible now: it's more public, it's more scrutinized, seen as a problem.

Men's magazines tell their readers that they need to get rid of body HAIR and more products are offering to do so; What role has History PLAYED in our body HAIR ATTITUDE? Archaeologists reckon that cavemen and CAVEWOMEN were the first to start SHAVING , using little stones as SHAVERS and tiny little shells as tweezers.

That was for more safety so that their ENEMIES had nothing to hold on to. Also, it was to stop FROSTBITES and LICE The Egyptians considered body HAIR be uncivilized. Women would remove HAIR from EYEBROWS down. The Romans made hair REMOVE more about class and used massive TWEEZERS LIKE things called «volsella».

Later, Charles Darwin taught the public that humans are descended from ape AS ancestor. We lost our fur due to sexual selection. We preferred hairless mates. So HAIRNESS HAS BECAME common, and in turning beautiful. Through the years, that idea has evolved and with clothes getting shorter, it HAS BECAME more of a focus. Males now have an ideal body image which has shifted from hairy to smooth and hairless.

We need a more neutral and natural attitude and see it as a PERSONAL decision and not necessary as a public and politic statement. If there ARE more choice, more freedom and fewer SHAVED BODY, things WILL be different in the future.

Dear Here4u , I am afraid I haven't helped your friend as he should be to ,I am conscious I have left many mistakes and done others inside my correction despite my good will.
Thanks a lot for your new test

---

Réponse : Rack Your Brains and Help!/ 40 de joe39, postée le 20-02-2019 à 18:24:56 (S | E)
Hello dear here4u,
Here you are my try, ready to be checked.
I)Please, help my student! He really needs you! ATTENTION ! Ce texte contient 2O fautes à corriger !
There’s a double STANDARDS concerning a woman having armpit HAIR and a man having armpit HAIR… Should you HOLD THEM or TO wax THEM? There’s most PRESSURE for men these days to do that. As a man, have a hairless body is about beauty and not masculinity. In the case of women, have a hairless body means be beautiful and feminine. So, you can’t be feminine and have body hairs…
Can the choice between HAIRY AND HAIRLESS BODIES BE or not be sexist?
A model who had chosen not to have or wax got rape THREATS. A rape can be seen as a way to express control. Therefore, here body hairs were considered as something out of control and which needed to be controlled. She had stopped waxing because she had realised that society made her feeling PRESSURE to wax, because she was a woman, not because she wanted TO. She heard «No guys will want you if you don’t have...» or «It’s unhygienic!» Men now! For having his shirt open and showing HIS HAIRY CHESTED, an actor was asked: «Are you man enough for the hairy chested revival?» The male body is definitely more visible now: it’s more public, it’s more scrutinized, AND seen as a problem. Men’s magazines tell their readers that they need to get rid of body hairs and more products are BEING OFFERED to do so;
What role has History PLAYED in our body HAIR attitudes? Archaeologists reckon that cavemen and women were the first to start having THEM, using little stones as SHAVERS and tiny little shells as tweezers. That was for more safety so that their ENEMIES had nothing to hold on to. Also, it was to stop FROSTBITES and LICE. The Egyptians considered body HAIR be uncivilized. Women would remove HAIR from EYEBROW down. The Romans made hair removed more about class and used massive TWEEZERS LIKE things called «volsella». Later, Charles Darwin taught the public that humans are descended from an APE-LIKE ancestor. We lost our fur due to sexual selection. We preferred hairless mates. So hairlessness became common, and in turning beautiful. Through the years, that idea has evolved and with clothes getting shorter, it became more of a focus. Males now have an ideal body image which has shifted from hairy to smooth and hairless.
We need a more neutral and natural attitude and see it as a PERSONAL decision and not necessary as a public and politic statement. If there’s more choice, more freedom and LESS body SHAME, things could be different in the future.

II) Find the «scrambled » words or reorder them in these three sentences:

1.AROUND the WORLD, MEN are SHAVING, INCLUDING CHEST, BACKS, LEGS and BROWS. 9
2. For both men and women body hair is increasingly seen as a worry./ 13
3. Sorry, I give up.

III) OPTIONAL: Please, reorder the words or unscramble them in these sentences so as to make meaningful sentences:
a) Sorry, I give up.
b) In the LAST COUPLE of YEARS PLENTY of ARTICLES have CALLED for women to stop REMOVING and start GROWING. 8

Thanking a lot for the nice exercise, I hope you have a pleasant evening.

So long.
Joe39

---

Réponse : Rack Your Brains and Help!/ 40 de alpiem, postée le 21-02-2019 à 18:12:57 (S | E)
hello,here4u I hope you're fine

Répondre au sujet (106103) Rack Your Brains and Help!/ 40...

correction- ready:
There’s a double standard concerning a woman having armpit HAIR and a man having armpit HAIR… Should you
Shave IT or wax IT? There’s most pression for men these days to do that. As FOR a man, havING a hairless body is about beauty and not masculinity. In the case of women, havING a hairless body means be beautiful and feminine. So, you can’t be feminine and have body hairs…

Can the choice between HAVING body hair or not be sexist? A model who had chosen not to SHAVE or wax got rape threaTs. A rape can be seen as a way to express control. Therefore, here body hairs were considered as something out of control and which needed to be controlled. She had stopped waxing because she had realised that society made her FEEL pression to wax, because she was a woman, not because she wanted. She heard «No guys will want you if you don’t Shave...» or «It’s unhygienic!» Men now! For having his shirt open and showing chesthairs, an actor was asked: «Are you man enough for the hairy- chested revival?» The male body is definitely more visible now: it’s more public, it’s more scrutinized, seen as a problem. Men’s magazines tell their readers that they need to get rid of body hair and more products are offering to do so;
What role has History playED in our body-hair attitudes? Archaeologists reckon that cavemen and women were the first to start having USED little stones as Shavers and tiny little shells as tweezers. That was for more safety so that their ennemies had nothing to hold on to. Also, it was to stop frostbite and louse. The Egyptians considered body hairs be uncivilized. Women would remove hair from eyebrowns down. The Romans made hair removed more about class and used massive tweezer liking things called «volsella». Later, Charles Darwin taught the public that humans are descended from an ape like ancestor. We lost our fur due to sexual selection. We preferred hairless mates. So hairlessness became common, and in turning, beautiful. Through the years, that idea has evolved and with clothes getting shorter, it became more of a focus. Males now have an ideal body image which has shifted from hairy to smooth and hairless.
We need a more neutral and natural attitude and see it as a personnal decision and not necessary as a public and politic statement. If there’s more choice, more freedom and fewer body shaming, things could be different in the future.

---

Réponse : Rack Your Brains and Help!/ 40 de here4u, postée le 22-02-2019 à 11:51:55 (S | E)
Hello!

I've started the transfers of your corrections...

Still a few days to post...

---

Réponse : Rack Your Brains and Help!/ 40 de nate, postée le 23-02-2019 à 17:48:13 (S | E)
Hello there.

Here's my try. Thank you very much.

READY FOR CORRECTION

There’s a double standard concerning a woman having HAIRY ARMPITS (armpits hair également bon je suppose) and a man having HAIRY ARMPITS … Should you KEEP YOUR HAIR or wax IT ? There’s MORE PRESSURE for men these days to do that. As a man, HAVING a hairless body is about beauty and not masculinity. In the case of women, HAVING a hairless body means TO be beautiful and feminine. So, you can’t be feminine and have body HAIR…
CAN THERE BE A CHOICE BETWEEN HAVING BODY HAIR OR NOT TO BE SEXIST? (Je ne sais pas si cette phrase a un sens mais je ne vois pas comment corriger la version initiale...)
A model who had chosen not to SHAVE or wax got rape THREATS. A rape can be seen as a way to express DOMINATION. Therefore, here body HAIR WAS REGARDED as something out of control and which needed to be controlled. She had stopped waxing because she had realised that society made her FEEL PRESSURE to wax, because she was a woman, not because she wanted TO (or IT). She heard «No guys will want you if you (don’t = non) have...» or «It’s unhygienic!» Men now! For having his shirt open and showing HIS CHEAST HAIR, an actor was asked: «Are you man enough for the hairy- chested revival?» The male body is definitely more visible now: it’s more public, it’s more scrutinized, seen as a problem. Men’s magazines tell their readers that they need to get rid of THEIR body HAIR and more products are offering to do so;
What role has History PLAYED in our body HAIR attitudes? Archaeologists reckon that cavemen and women were the first to start (having, = non) using (ou bien TO START HAVING USED) little stones as RAZORS and tiny little shells as tweezers (as = en tant que ici, like ne fontionnerait pas, non ?). That was for more safety so that their ENEMIES had nothing to hold on to. Also, it was to stop frostbite and LICE. The Egyptians considered body HAIR TO be uncivilized. Women would remove hairs (pour moi HAIRS ou HAIR peuvent marcher. Ca dépend si elles enlèvent quelques poils = hairs ou tout les poils = hair) from THEIR EYEBROWS (down, to remove down ?? Je crois que la préposition est en trop). The Romans made hair removed more about class and used massive tweezer (liking : non) things called «volsella». Later, Charles Darwin taught the public that humans (are = non) descended from an ape AS AN ancestor. We lost our fur due to sexual selection. We preferred hairless mates. So hairlessness became common, and TURNED TO BE beautiful. Through the years, that idea has evolved and with clothes getting shorter, it became more of a focus. Males now have an ideal body image which has shifted from hairy to smooth and hairless.
We need a more neutral and natural attitude and see it as a PERSONAL decision and not necessary as a public and POLITICAL statement. If there’s more choice, more freedom and LESS body shaming, things could be different in the future.

---

Réponse : Rack Your Brains and Help!/ 40 de maxwell, postée le 24-02-2019 à 07:19:05 (S | E)
FINISHED
Hello Here4U
I hope you're not going to hate me as I couldn't come up with a "better" sentence, reordering words, than the one you're going to read, which sounds awfully macho, which I'm not.
Besides, I'm stunned reading that a model got rape threats because she didn't agree to shave or wax?!! I hope I'm wrong.
What an exercise full of emotions

I) Help my student:
There's a double standard concerning a woman having armpit HAIR and a man having armpit HAIR? Should you SHAVE or wax? There's MORE PRESSURE ON men these days to do that. As a man, HAVING a hairless body is about beauty and not masculinity. In the case of women, HAVING a hairless body means BEING beautiful and feminine. So, you can't BOTH be feminine and have body HAIR?
Can the choice between SHAVING body HAIR or not be sexist?
A model who had chosen not to SHAVE or wax got rape THREATS. A rape can be seen as a way to express control. Therefore, HER body HAIR WAS considered as something out of control and which needed to be controlled. She had stopped waxing because she had realised that society made her FEEL PRESSURE to wax, because she was a woman, not because she wanted TO. She heard «No GUY will want you if you don't SHAVE...» or «It's unhygienic!»
Men now! For having his shirt open and showing CHEST HAIR, an actor was asked: «Are you man enough for the hairy-chested revival?» The male body is definitely more visible now: it's more IN public VIEW, it's more scrutinized, seen as a problem. Men's magazines tell their readers that they need to get rid of body HAIR and more AND MORE products are offering to do so;
What role has History PLAYED in our body HAIR attitudes? Archaeologists reckon that cavemen and women were the first to start SHAVING, using little stones as SHAVERS and tiny little shells as tweezers. That was for more safety so that their ENEMIES had nothing to hold on to. Also, it was to stop frostbite and LICE. The Egyptians considered body HAIR TO be uncivilized. Women would remove HAIR from EYEBROWS []. The Romans made hair REMOVAL more about class and used massive tweezer-LIKE things called «volsella». Later, Charles Darwin taught the public that humans WERE descended from an ape[-]like ancestor. We lost our fur due to sexual selection. We preferred hairless mates. So hairlessness became common, and in TURN beautiful. Through the years, that idea has evolved and with clothes getting shorter, it became more of a focus. Males now have an ideal body image which has shifted from hairy to smooth and hairless.
We need a more neutral and natural attitude and see it as a PERSONAL decision and not NECESSARILY as a public and POLITICAL statement. If there's more choice, more freedom and LESS body shaming, things could be different in the future.

II) Reorder the words/Scrambled letters:
1. AROUND the WORLD, MEN are SHAVING, INCLUDING CHEST, BACK, LEGS and BROWS.
2. BODY HAIR IS INCREASINGLY SEEN AS A WORRY FOR BOTH MEN AND WOMEN.
3. Be nice : your clean man needs to be shaved every hair off for yourself, for girls.

III) b) In the LAST COUPLE of YEARS PLENTY of LTACIERS have CALLED for women to stop REMOVING and start GROWING.

---

Réponse : Rack Your Brains and Help!/ 40 de here4u, postée le 25-02-2019 à 16:38:15 (S | E)
Hello!

Correction ce soir ... Me voici repartie à la recherche de volontaires ... (3 pour le texte et un(e) pour les phrases à traduire ...
d'y penser ...

---

Réponse : Rack Your Brains and Help!/ 40 de here4u, postée le 25-02-2019 à 23:37:48 (S | E)
Hello Dear Friends!

Encore quelques (petits) grognements … Le devoir était encore difficile aux yeux de certains d'entre vous … Pourtant nombreux sont ceux qui avaient presque tout bon ! Bravo , donc … Le texte n’était pas très difficile. La remise en ordre l’était, bien sûr, davantage … et assez chronophage aussi …

Me voici, comme annoncé au-dessus, en train de faire appel à 4 volontaires pour faire le "follow-up work' de cette correction : il s'agit pour trois d'entre vous de traduire le texte corrigé (J'ai mis des signes /// pour indiquer les différentes parties !), et pour un(e) autre de traduire les phrases reconstituées.
à vous.

I)Please, help my student! He really needs you!

There’s a double standard concerning a woman having armpit hair (1) and a man having armpit hair… Should you shave (2) or wax ? There’s more (3) pressure (4) on (5) men these days to do that. As a man, having a hairless body is about beauty and not masculinity. In the case of women, having a hairless body means being beautiful and feminine. So, you can’t be feminine and have body hair…
Can the choice between body hair or not be sexist ? A model who had chosen not to shave or wax got rape threats(6). A rape can be seen as a way to express control. Therefore, here body hair was(1) considered as something out of control and which needed to be controlled. She had stopped waxing because she had realised that society had made (7) her feel (8) pressure to wax, because she was a woman, not because she wanted to (9). (/// end of part 1) She heard « No guys will want you if you don’t shave... » or « It’s unhygienic ! » Men now ! For having his shirt open and showing chesthair, an actor was asked : « Are you man enough for the hairy-chested revival? » The male body is definitely more visible now: it’s more public, it’s more scrutinized, seen as a problem. Men’s magazines tell their readers that they need to get rid of body hair and more products are offered (8) to do so;
What role has History played (9) in our body hair attitudes? Archaeologists reckon that cavemen and women were the first to start shaving, using little stones as shavers and tiny little shells as tweezers. That was for more safety so that their enemies(10) had nothing to hold on to. Also, it was to stop frostbites and lice(11). The Egyptians considered body hair to (12) be uncivilized.Women would remove hair from eyebrows (13) down. (/// end of part 2) The Romans made hair removal (14) more about class and used massive tweezer like things(15) called "volsella". Later, Charles Darwin taught the public that humans are descended from an ape like ancestor. We lost our fur due to sexual selection. We preferred hairless mates. So hairlessness became common, and in turn (16) beautiful. Through the years, that idea has evolved and with clothes getting shorter, it became more of a focus. Males now have an ideal body image which has shifted from hairy to smooth and hairless.
We need a more neutral and natural attitude and see it as a personal(17) decision and not necessarily (18) as a public and political (19) statement. If there’s more choice, more freedom and less body shaming(20), things could be different in the future.

(1) ATTENTION ! Tout au long du texte, mon élève a maltraité l’indénombrable « hair ». Il en a fait un dénombrable pluriel. Il y a mis un –s, et un verbe au pluriel. (il ne lui FAUT pas de pluriel et son verbe – et les pronoms – sont au singulier. Your hair IS too long. You should have IT cut. S'il s'agit d'un poil isolé (ou de quelques-uns), hair peut être dénombrable.
(2) To shave = raser a souvent, ici, été transformé en « have ». Voir selon le contexte.
(3- 4- 5) « There’s most (3) pression (4) for(5) men » = there’s MORE pressure ON men… more est le comparatif alors que « most » est superlatif. To put pressure ON someone.
(6) A rape THREAT à ne pas confondre avec « THREAD »= un fil.
(7) having a hairless body/ being beautiful …. = le fait d’avoir/ le fait d’être … = GERONDIFS= des NOMS. To have = pour avoir.
(8) products are offered = sont offerts (l’action passive est subie. Si vous mettez « offering », le sujet fait l’action = en train d’offrir.
(9) to play , I played, played= verbe REGULIER. Ne pas confondre avec PAY, paid, paid = payer, irrégulier.
(10) an ENEMY = un seul N. (mais deux en français !)
(11) a louse => several lice (même pluriel que mouse/ mice.)
(12) to consider something to be = considérer être.
(13) BrowN= brun, la couleur.// Brows and eyebrows. = cils et sourcils.
(14) to remove = enlever, ôter=> le nom = a removal.
(15) a massive tweezer-like-thing= a huge thing which looks like big tweezers.
(16) in turn= ensuite, tour à tour.
(17) personal= un seul N en anglais.
(18) necessary= adjectif ; necessarily.
(19) a political statement
(20) shame/ shaming= indénombrable.

II) Please, reorder the words or unscramble them in these sentences so as to make meaningful sentences:

1. DURNOA the DRWLO, ENM are GIASNVH, GIUCINDLN HTECS, KABC, SEGL and SOBWR. 9
Around the world, men are shaving, including chest, back, legs and brows.

2. WORRY/ INCREASINGLY/ MEN/ HAIR/ WOMEN/ BODY/ AS/ IS/ A/ AND/ BOTH/ SEEN/ FOR/ 13
Body hair is increasingly seen as a worry for both men and women.

3. EVERY/ MAN/ GIRLS/ OFF/ BE/ BE/ YOURSELF/ HAIR/ FOR/ FOR/ TO/ SHAVED/ CLEAN/ NICE/ YOUR/ NEEDS/ 16
« For girls, hair needs to be shaved off: clean yourself, be nice for your man… »

OPTIONAL:
a) A/ LOTS/ HAIR/ HAIR/ GUY/ CHEST/ CHEST/ GUY/ MANLIER/ PROBABLY/ LITTLE/ WITH/ WITH/ THAN/ OF/ IS/ A/ A/ NO/
A guy with lots of chest hair is probably a little manlier than a guy with no chest hair. 19

b) In the TALS EPOLUC of SAYRE NYLTPE of SLTAECIR have LDAELC for women to stop IOGENVMR and start GIOGNWR. 8
In the last couple of years plenty of articles have called for women to stop removing and start growing. 19

Encore MERCI de votre travail et de tout le temps que vous y avez consacré ... et Bravo !

---

Réponse : Rack Your Brains and Help!/ 40 de chocolatcitron, postée le 26-02-2019 à 02:48:27 (S | E)
Hello my dear Here4u!
Hi Everybody !

Je suis volontaire pour l'exercice 1 première partie, et l'exercice 2 !!!
Voici une traduction possible.
Here4u merci pour ton gros travail !


Here is my work: FINISHED.

I) Please, help my student! He really needs you!

There’s a double standard concerning a woman having armpit hair (1) and a man having armpit hair… Should you shave (2) or wax ? There’s more (3) pressure (4) on (5) men these days to do that. As a man, having a hairless body is about beauty and not masculinity. In the case of women, having a hairless body means being beautiful and feminine. So, you can’t be feminine and have body hair…
Can the choice between body hair or not be sexist ? A model who had chosen not to shave or wax got rape threats(6). A rape can be seen as a way to express control. Therefore, here body hair
was(1) considered as something out of control and which needed to be controlled. She had stopped waxing because she had realised that society had made (7) her feel (8) pression to wax, because she was a woman, not because she wanted to (9). (/// end of part 1)

Il y a deux standards concernant une femme aux aisselles poilues, et les hommes aux aisselles poilues… Devriez-vous vous raser ou vous épiler ? Il y a plus de pression sur les hommes, à notre époque pour le faire. En tant qu’homme, avoir un corps imberbe reflète la beauté, et non la masculinité. Dans le cas des femmes, avoir un corps imberbe signifie être belle et féminine. Mais vous ne pouvez pas être féminine et avoir un corps poilu…
Le choix entre un corps velu ou imberbe peut-il être sexiste ? Un modèle qui a choisi de ne pas se raser, ni de s’épiler, a des menaces de viols. Un viol peut être vu comme une contrainte pour exprimer un contrôle. Toutefois, ici, les poils corporels sont considérés comme étant hors contrôle, et qui nécessitent d’être contrôlés. Elle a arrêté de s’épiler car elle a réalisé que la société l’avait obligée à s’épiler, puisqu’ elle est une femme, et non parce qu’elle le voulait.



II) Please, reorder the words or unscramble them in these sentences so as to make meaningful sentences:
1. DURNOA the DRWLO, ENM are GIASNVH, GIUCINDLN HTECS, KABC, SEGL and SOBWR. 9
Around the world, men are shaving, including chest, back, legs and brows.

Dans le monde, les hommes se rasent en incluant la poitrine, le dos, les jambes et les sourcils.


2. WORRY/ INCREASINGLY/ MEN/ HAIR/ WOMEN/ BODY/ AS/ IS/ A/ AND/ BOTH/ SEEN/ FOR/ 13
Body hair is increasingly seen as a worry for both men and women.

Les poils corporels sont de plus en plus vus comme une préoccupation pour les deux sexes hommes et femmes.


3. EVERY/ MAN/ GIRLS/ OFF/ BE/ BE/ YOURSELF/ HAIR/ FOR/ FOR/ TO/ SHAVED/ CLEAN/ NICE/ YOUR/ NEEDS/ 16
« For girls, hair needs to be shaved off: clean yourself, be nice for your man… »
« Pour les filles, les poils doivent être enlevés : épilez-vous, soyez belle pour votre homme… »



OPTIONAL:
a) A/ LOTS/ HAIR/ HAIR/ GUY/ CHEST/ CHEST/ GUY/ MANLIER/ PROBABLY/ LITTLE/ WITH/ WITH/ THAN/ OF/ IS/ A/ A/ NO/
A guy with lots of chest hair is probably a little manlier than a guy with no chest hair. 19

Un type avec beaucoup de poils sur la poitrine est probablement un peu plus viril qu’un autre gars à la poitrine imberbe.



b) In the TALS EPOLUC of SAYRE NYLTPE of SLTAECIR have LDAELC for women to stop IOGENVMR and start GIOGNWR. 8
In the last couple of years plenty of articles have called for women to stop removing and start growing. 19

Ces deux dernières années, de nombreux articles ont demandé aux femmes d’arrêter de traquer les poils et de les laisser pousser.


Mon Internet semble beaucoup plus stable depuis environ 20 h , dommage pour ce forum auquel je n'ai pas pu participer à temps !!!

Je laisse encore deux membres continuer le travail amorcé.
Have a very sweet week!
See you soon!

-------------------
Modifié par chocolatcitron le 27-02-2019 18:50

---

Réponse : Rack Your Brains and Help!/ 40 de magie8, postée le 26-02-2019 à 09:12:06 (S | E)
bonjour , j'essaie la traduction de la 2éme partie espérant ne pas donner trop de travail de correction

---

Réponse : Rack Your Brains and Help!/ 40 de magie8, postée le 26-02-2019 à 10:12:26 (S | E)
end of part 1) She heard « No guys will want you if you don’t shave... » or « It’s unhygienic ! » Men now ! For having his shirt open and showing chesthair, an actor was asked : « Are you man enough for the hairy-chested revival? » The male body is definitely more visible now: it’s more public, it’s more scrutinized, seen as a problem. Men’s magazines tell their readers that they need to get rid of body hair and more products are offered (8) to do so;
What role has History played (9) in our body hair attitudes? Archaeologists reckon that cavemen and women were the first to start shaving, using little stones as shavers and tiny little shells as tweezers. That was for more safety so that their enemies(10) had nothing to hold on to. Also, it was to stop frostbites and lice(11). The Egyptians considered body hair to (12) be uncivilized.Women would remove hair from eyebrows (13) down. (/// end of part 2)

Elle entendait" aucun garçon ne voudra de toi si tu n'es pas rasée." ou" ce n 'est pas hygiènique!" Les Hommes maintenant! En ayant sa chemise ouverte et montrant sa poitrine velue, un acteur disait "Etes -vous suffisamment homme pour la remise en vigueur des poils sur la poitrine?Le corps mâle est nettement plus visible maintenant, il est publique, il est davantage scruté,vu comme un problème.Les magazines masculins racontent à leur lecteurs qu'ils ont besoin de se débarrasser des poils et de plus en plus de produits sont proposés pour le faire.
Quel rôle a joué l'Histoire dans nos attitudes face à la pilosité corporelle?
Les Archéologues estiment que les hommes et les femmes des cavernes ont été les premiers à commencer de se raser en utilisant des petites pierres comme rasoirs et des petits coquillages doux en guise de pinces.C'était pour davantage de sécurité afin que leurs ennemis n'aient rien à retenir sur eux.Egalement pour stopper les engelures et les poux.
Les Egyptiens considéraient les poils du corps comme non civilisés.Les femmes voulaient épiler leur sourcils.

---

Réponse : Rack Your Brains and Help!/ 40 de here4u, postée le 27-02-2019 à 23:09:18 (S | E)
Hello!

Voici le début des traductions post-corrections. Merci à celles qui ont commencé ... Il reste une partie à faire et j'espère bien que les hommes (hairy or not! ) sauveront l'honneur ! Je compte sur vous ...

Ce que je souligne n'est pas faux ... et est même peut-être bon ... mais dans le contexte précis du texte, je préfère autre chose ...

There’s a double standard concerning a woman having armpit hair (1) and a man having armpit hair… Should you shave (2) or wax ? There’s more (3) pressure (4) on (5) men these days to do that. As a man, having a hairless body is about beauty and not masculinity. In the case of women, having a hairless body means being beautiful and feminine. So, you can’t be feminine and have body hair…
Can the choice between body hair or not be sexist ? A model who had chosen not to shave or wax got rape threats(6). A rape can be seen as a way to express control. Therefore, here body hair
was(1) considered as something out of control and which needed to be controlled. She had stopped waxing because she had realised that society had made (7) her feel (8) pression to wax, because she was a woman, not because she wanted to (9). (/// end of part 1)

Il y a deux standards (pas faux, mais je n'aime pas les calques ...) deux poids deux mesures concernant une femme aux aisselles poilues, et les hommes aux aisselles poilues… Devriez-vous vous raser ou vous épiler ?* Il y a plus de pression sur les hommes, à notre époque pour le faire. En tant qu’homme, avoir un corps imberbe reflète la beauté, et non la masculinité. Dans le cas des femmes, avoir un corps imberbe signifie être belle et féminine. Mais vous ne pouvez pas être féminine et avoir un corps poilu …
Le choix entre un corps velu ou imberbe peut-il être sexiste ? Un modèle mannequin qui aVAIT choisi de ne pas se raser, ni de s’épiler, a reçu des menaces de viols. Un viol peut être vu comme une contrainte pour façon d' exprimer un que l'on a le contrôle. Toutefois, ici, les poils corporels sont considérés comme étant hors contrôle, et qui nécessitent d’être contrôlés. Elle a arrêté de s’épiler car elle a réalisé s'est rendu compte que la société l’avait obligée à s’épiler, puisqu’elle est= puisque c'est une femme, et non parce qu’elle le voulait.
Bravo, Choco ! Texte très bien compris et traduit ! merci à toi ...
wax= de la cire.

Lien internet
;
JE SAIS qu'imberbe peut, en sens secondaires s'appliquer à toutes les parties du corps ... mais vraiment, les femmes imberbes m'ont gênées ... Il en est presque de même pour "glabre", à un degré un peu moins élevé cependant ... Dans cette version, au lieu d'imberbe, je préfère "sans aucun poil", moins joli, certes, mais plus simple (j'aime la simplicité ... )et surtout sans équivoques.


Ex. II)

1. DURNOA the DRWLO, ENM are GIASNVH, GIUCINDLN HTECS, KABC, SEGL and SOBWR. 9
Around the world, men are shaving, including chest, back, legs and brows.
Dans le monde entier, les hommes se rasent en incluant la poitrine, le dos, les jambes et les sourcils. TTB
2. WORRY/ INCREASINGLY/ MEN/ HAIR/ WOMEN/ BODY/ AS/ IS/ A/ AND/ BOTH/ SEEN/ FOR/ 13
Body hair is increasingly seen as a worry for both men and women.
Les poils corporels sont de plus en plus vus considérés comme une préoccupation pour les deux sexes hommes et femmes.TTB
3. EVERY/ MAN/ GIRLS/ OFF/ BE/ BE/ YOURSELF/ HAIR/ FOR/ FOR/ TO/ SHAVED/ CLEAN/ NICE/ YOUR/ NEEDS/ 16
« For girls, hair needs to be shaved off: clean yourself, be nice for your man… »
« Pour les filles, les poils doivent être enlevés : épilez-vous faites vous propres, soyez belle pour votre homme… » TTB
OPTIONAL:
a) A/ LOTS/ HAIR/ HAIR/ GUY/ CHEST/ CHEST/ GUY/ MANLIER/ PROBABLY/ LITTLE/ WITH/ WITH/ THAN/ OF/ IS/ A/ A/ NO/
A guy with lots of chest hair is probably a little manlier than a guy with no chest hair. 19
Un type avec beaucoup de poils sur la poitrine (à la poitrine velue) est probablement un peu plus viril qu’un autre gars à la poitrine imberbe. TTB

b) In the TALS EPOLUC of SAYRE NYLTPE of SLTAECIR have LDAELC for women to stop IOGENVMR and start GIOGNWR. 8
In the last couple of years plenty of articles have called for women to stop removing and start growing. 19
Ces deux dernières années, de nombreux articles ont demandé aux femmes d’arrêter de traquer les poils et de les laisser pousser.TTB

Bravo, Choco ! ... et MERCI (de notre part à tous...)!

---

Réponse : Rack Your Brains and Help!/ 40 de here4u, postée le 27-02-2019 à 23:26:20 (S | E)
Hello!
Suite ...

end of part 1) She heard « No guys will want you if you don’t shave... » or « It’s unhygienic ! » Men now ! For having his shirt open and showing chesthair, an actor was asked : « Are you man enough for the hairy-chested revival? » The male body is definitely more visible now: it’s more public, it’s more scrutinized, seen as a problem. Men’s magazines tell their readers that they need to get rid of body hair and more products are offered (8) to do so;
What role has History played (9) in our body hair attitudes? Archaeologists reckon that cavemen and women were the first to start shaving, using little stones as shavers and tiny little shells as tweezers. That was for more safety so that their enemies(10) had nothing to hold on to. Also, it was to stop frostbites and lice(11). The Egyptians considered body hair to (12) be uncivilized. Women would remove hair from eyebrows (13) down. (/// end of part 2)

Elle entendait" aucun garçon mec ne voudra de toi si tu n'es pas rasée." ou" ce n 'est pas hygiènique!" Les Hommes maintenant! En ayant sa chemise ouverte et montrantParce qu'il avait la chemise ouverte et montrait une ... sa poitrine velue, un acteur disait (attention ! c'est un passif - auxiliaire "to be" + participe passé)l'on demanda à un acteur : = "Etes -vous suffisamment homme= assez viril pour la remise en vigueur (relancer la mode ...) des poils sur la poitrine ? Le corps mâle est nettement plus visible maintenant, il est publique, il est davantage scruté, vu comme un problème. Les magazines masculins racontent à leur lecteurs qu'ils ont besoin de se débarrasser des poils et de plus en plus de produits sont proposés pour le faire. TTB
Quel rôle a joué l'Histoire dans nos attitudes face à la pilosité corporelle?TTB
Les Archéologues estiment que les hommes et les femmes des cavernes ont été les premiers à commencer * de se raser en utilisant des petites pierres comme rasoirs et des petits coquillages doux en guise de pinces. C'était pour davantage de sécurité afin que leurs ennemis n'aient rien à retenir sur eux. = ne puisse pas les attraper par les cheveux ... Egalement pour stopper les engelures et les poux.TTB
Les Egyptiens considéraient les poils du corps comme non civilisés. Les femmes voulaient épiler leur sourcils. s'enlèveraient tout poil au dessous des sourcils.

* ici, je dirais "commencer à se raser ..." Lien internet

- tiny = minuscule

Bravo pour cette très bonne correction courageuse ...

---

Réponse : Rack Your Brains and Help!/ 40 de maxwell, postée le 02-03-2019 à 11:50:47 (S | E)
Hello! FINISHED
All right, I'll take part III.
Not hairy as a matter of fact


The Romans made hair removal more about class and used massive tweezer like things called "volsella". Later, Charles Darwin taught the public that humans are descended from an ape like ancestor. We lost our fur due to sexual selection. We preferred hairless mates. So hairlessness became common, and in turn beautiful. Through the years, that idea has evolved and with clothes getting shorter, it became more of a focus. Males now have an ideal body image which has shifted from hairy to smooth and hairless.
We need a more neutral and natural attitude and see it as a personal decision and not necessarily as a public and political statement. If there’s more choice, more freedom and less body shaming, things could be different in the future.

Les romains firent de l'épilation plus une question de classe et utilisèrent de gros instruments ressemblant à des pinces à épiler appelées "volsella". Plus tard, Charles Darwin enseigna au public que les humains descendent d'un ancêtre proche du singe. Nous perdîmes notre fourrure en raison d'une sélection sexuelle. Nous préférions des partenaires sans poils. Par conséquent, l'absence de pilosité devint courante, et de ce fait, très belle. A travers les années, cette idée a évolué et, les vêtements devenant plus courts, le sujet a pris davantage d'importance. Les mâles ont maintenant l'image d'un corps idéal qui est passé de poilu à lisse et sans poils. Il nous faut une attitude plus neutre et naturelle et voir cela comme une décision personnelle et pas nécessairement comme une affirmation publique et politique. Si on laisse plus de place au choix et à la liberté individuelle et moins de place aux humiliations du corps, les choses pourraient changer à l'avenir.

---

Réponse : Rack Your Brains and Help!/ 40 de alpiem, postée le 02-03-2019 à 11:57:47 (S | E)
hello,Here,this is my work.


The Romans made hair removed more about class and used massive tweezer- like things called «volsella». Later, Charles Darwin taught the public that humans descended from an ape like ancestor. We lost our fur due to sexual selection. We preferred hairless mates. So hairlessness became common, and in turn beautiful. Through the years, that idea has evolved and with clothes getting shorter, it became more of a focus. Males now have an ideal body image which has shifted from hairy to smooth and hairless.
We need a more neutral and natural attitude and see it as a personnal decision and not necessary as a public and politic statement. If there’s more choice, more freedom and fewer body shaming, things could be different in the future.

Les Romains se rasèrent les cheveux plutôt par souci de classe et ils utilisèrent comme d'énormes pinces appelées « volsella ». Plus tard, Charles Darwin fit savoir au public que les humains avaient le singe comme ascendant. La sélection sexuelle nous fit perdre notre fourrure et cela devint la mode, et de là,plus
agréable. Pendant des années, les idées evoluèrent et, les vêtements se raccourcissant ,cela prit encore plus d'importance . Le mâle a, maintenant , une image de son corps qui est passé de poilu à doux et glabre.
Nous devons garder une attitude plus neutre et naturelle et voir cela comme une décision personnelle et non pas
necessairement comme une démarche publique et politique.Pour que les choses puissent évoluer dans le futur,
il faut plus de choix, plus de liberté et plus de tolérance du corps.

-------------------
Modifié par alpiem le 02-03-2019 16:11

---

Réponse : Rack Your Brains and Help!/ 40 de here4u, postée le 02-03-2019 à 13:10:39 (S | E)
Hello!

Deux de nos hommes ont sauvé l'honneur ! Bravo et merci ! Alpiem m'avait prévenue ... et ils ont posté presque en même temps !

The Romans made hair removal more about class and used massive tweezer like things called "volsella". Later, Charles Darwin taught the public that humans are descended from an ape like ancestor. We lost our fur due to sexual selection. We preferred hairless mates. So hairlessness became common, and in turn beautiful. Through the years, that idea has evolved and with clothes getting shorter, it became more of a focus. Males now have an ideal body image which has shifted from hairy to smooth and hairless.
We need a more neutral and natural attitude and see it as a personal decision and not necessarily as a public and political statement. If there’s more choice, more freedom and less body shaming, things could be different in the future.

Les romains firent de l'épilation plus une question de classe et utilisèrent de gros instruments ressemblant à des pinces à épiler appelées "volsella". Plus tard, Charles Darwin enseigna au public que les humains descendent d'un ancêtre proche (j'aurais eu envie que tu insistes sur la ressemblance !) du singe. Nous perdîmes notre fourrure en raison d'une sélection sexuelle. Nous préférions des partenaires sans poils. Par conséquent, l'absence de pilosité devint courante, et de ce fait, très belle. A travers les années, cette idée a évolué et, les vêtements devenant plus courts, le sujet a pris davantage d'importance. Les mâles ont maintenant l'image d'un corps idéal qui est passé de poilu à lisse et sans poils. Il nous faut une attitude plus neutre et naturelle et voir cela comme une décision personnelle et pas nécessairement comme une affirmation publique et politique. Si on laisse plus de place au choix et à la liberté individuelle et moins de place aux humiliations du (de son corps) corps, les choses pourraient changer à l'avenir.

Les Romains se razèrent les cheveux (le texte ne précise pas ce qu'ils rasaient ou épilaient ! ) plutôt par souci de classe et ils utilisèrent comme des instruments ressemblant à d'énormes pinces appelées « volsella ». Plus tard, Charles Darwin fit savoir au public que les humains avaient (le singe comme)un ascendant qui ressemblait au singe. La sélection sexuelle nous fit perdre notre fourrure et cela devint la mode, et de là, plus agréable. Pendant des années, les idées évoluèrent et, les vêtements se raccourcissant, cela prit encore plus d'importance. Le mâle a, maintenant, une image de son corps qui est passé de poilu à doux et glabre.
Nous devons garder une attitude plus neutre et naturelle et voir cela comme une décision personnelle et non pas
nécessairement comme une démarche publique et politique. Pour que les choses puissent évoluer dans le futur,
il faut plus de choix, plus de liberté et plus de tolérance du corps (moins de place à la honte provenant de son corps -un peu loin du texte ! )).

Bravo à tous les deux ... Corrections très intéressante de deux francophones ... Vous pouvez voir que le sens était bien le même des deux côtés, mais que l'un et/ou l'autre ont pensé à d'autres formules pour rendre ce même sens ! BRAVO et encore

---

[POSTER UNE NOUVELLE REPONSE] [Suivre ce sujet]

Cours gratuits > Forum > Exercices du forum